Upterix
The team

Built by people who've stood on muddy sites at 2 a.m.

Every senior Upterix engineer has hyperscale delivery scars — not just consulting credentials, not just design experience. They have built what they review.

  • 100%

    Senior-only on every engagement

  • 0

    Hours billed by juniors on audits

  • 2 a.m.

    Hours we've stood under live PDU breakers

Founders

The people behind Upterix.

Real photos and bios drop after the founding partners finish their current employment notice periods.

Photo + bio · drops Q3 2026

Co-Founder & CEO

Two to three sentences of background — programmes delivered, scars earned. Plus one short personal line about why they started Upterix.

LinkedInEmail
Photo + bio · drops Q3 2026

Co-Founder & CTO

Two to three sentences of background — programmes delivered, scars earned. Plus one short personal line about why they started Upterix.

LinkedInEmail

Senior engineers

Delivery scars, not just CVs.

Six senior-engineer seats. Three offers signed, three in progress. Domains shown below are the practice areas each seat covers — the people behind them roll out as their start dates land.

Open seat

Cooling & thermal

Prior programme · capacity · region.

Open seat

Electrical topology

Prior programme · capacity · region.

Open seat

MEP & mechanical

Prior programme · capacity · region.

Open seat

BIM & coordination

Prior programme · capacity · region.

Open seat

Constructability

Prior programme · capacity · region.

Open seat

Tender & commercial

Prior programme · capacity · region.

The hiring bar

Talent density over headcount.

Every senior Upterix engineer passes a hyperscale-delivery test. We refuse to staff an engagement rather than staff it with someone who should not be there.

If you have delivered hyperscale at field scale — and want to do it again, in a market that is only starting — we should talk.

How we operate

Ten principles. They are decision rules, not posters.

From hiring to pricing to partnerships, ten operating principles cast the deciding vote when the right answer is not obvious.